From my experience the tailwatcher and (not) suprisingly related HAM communities are magical in their ability to just trust their community and rarely get burned.
Only 4 active connections allowed per site on a popular HAM webring? Never hogged by bots.
Site that allows minimally authenticated posting of aircraft ACARS messages? Never seen it hijacked for ads.
Physics-limited space for nearly untracable HF radio transmissions that can span half the US? Handfull of trolls that voluntarily relegate themselves to the 'troll freqs'.
It's no surprise the site allows unauthenticated JSON; in the rest of the hobby the FCC makes most types of security outright illegal.
For a long while I’ve had the plan to spam the hell out of the ingestion points for nonconsensual spyware/telemetry in open source projects, rendering the collected data useless. Been too busy to write the code the last few years.
Interesting that the keyboard for these[0] is not a QWERTY keyboard but instead has the buttons arranged alphabetically. That must be a pain in the ass to type in. Is that because the tech is 50 years old from before QWERTY was the standard? Do newer planes have QWERTY?
You don't really need to type long form text on it. The primary use of the keyboard on the MCDU is for the flight management computer, and aviation fix names are 3 or 5 letters at most. That is the primary design case for the keyboard. ACARS is secondary, and on a typical flight only a few long-form text messages are sent.
Every aircraft that I've ever flown has an alphabetical keyboard. Typically horizontal space is valuable, yet vertical space is less valuable, so it's easy to make the keyboard long but not wide. However, as others pointed out, it seems to be changing in newer jets.
I think it’s long past time to reorder the alphabet to follow QWERTY order. It will make keyboarding much easier for children. We just need to write a new alphabet song.
Only until you're used to it. Then it's just as natural as switching between a keypad with a 1 in the top left versus one with a 7 in the top left. Your brain just takes the wheel.
My guess would be: QWERTZ touch typing was not a common skill in most pilots at the time these were introduced, and an ABC layout is slightly more ergonomical than QWERTZ for users not familiar with either.
Now that's changed, but changing the keyboard now would ruin older pilots' muscle memory.
Oooohhh!!! Back in the day I had an "opportunity" to implement a virtual CDU interface, even re-created that font to do it. It talked to a real FMC (and later anything on the ARINC 629 bus). Good times :)
A very common flow for me when I see something weird on adsb or fr24 is to grab the ICAO address of the plane and search it on https://app.airframes.io/ to see if it was sending out any ACARS messages so I can... see what the drama was ha!
It's a really fun hobby if you find this stuff interesting. You can pick up an SDR online for like $30 USD and be able to do all this without Internet, above your own home.
I knew watching every mentour pilot and blancolirio video would serve me well. I haven't yet heroically landed a plane after the pilots both had heart attacks, but at least I can read most of these.
Message: DISPMORNING. NEED LEO TO MEET THE AC. A PAX WAS INAPPROPRIATELY TOUCHING ANOTHER PAX IN THE ROW INFRONT OF THEM. THE FAS HAVE THE SEAT NUMBER ANDMANIFEST. FYI AND THX
- I know what ACARS, is and understood less of what's going on here after reading the "What is ACARS drama?"
- It's an uncomfortable mirror, a reminder that not everything has to become puerile entertainment. I wouldn't call anything I read in the messages "drama"
- The odd obsession over framing it as "drama" & humorous, to the point it is difficult to understand the "what is this?", and collaborators are invited to "Feed the drama"
- Open endpoint for anyone to contribute "drama", meaning, anyone can feed anything they want, into this very official-looking feed, without any sourcing / clarification / anything
I see how this can read quickly as negativity unfairly directed at creative spirit, the motive power behind man.
What tipped me over into "well, it's worth expressing the ick" is that a full 20% of the comments, 14/64, are communicating, speculating, then riffing on, a passenger being molested.
I think you are overthinking a fun little project with a memeish name. This stuff is just super fascinating and entertaining to aviation nerds. And using “drama” in the name is just typical hyperbole and almost like gen z / internet slang that you find online.
Comments riffing on the LEO request for PAX TOUCHING PAX is just typical forum stuff. Not something that I condone and somewhat unsavory, but it’s the internet and people riff on much more horrible stuff online. Doesn’t mean it’s okay but just not a specific flaw of this project, imo…
I'm with you on this. I had to look up what ACARS is, but I've been following the ATC YouTube channels that try to make infotainment and I don't like it. I get that the public has an interest in what's going on, but I dislike that there are teams of people sitting around with monitoring software for the express purpose of finding mistakes and faults in people. It just seems wrong. And my guess is in the next few years, we will see pilots unions ask for encrypted channels because they will argue that stress of a national audience will affect their decision making.
What's the legality of this? I was thinking of doing something similar but with POCSAG but from what I can tell it would be illegal because of ECPA(Electronic Communications Privacy Act)
Explicitly legal. ECPA has an carve out for listening to aeronautical radio traffic:
18 U.S.C. § 2511(2)(g)(ii)(I/IV):
"It shall not be unlawful under this chapter or chapter 121 of this title for any person to intercept any radio communication which is transmitted by any station for the use of the general public, or that relates to ships, aircraft, vehicles, or persons in distress;... or by any marine or aeronautical communications system."
The ones recorded in the US probably are legal to listen to and the ones in the UK probably are not. I think I remember reading somewhere that it’s not legal to record ATC in the UK. IANAL SIUKRTCL
Is it true, I have heard, that ACARS messages are like as expensive as sending data to Hubble, and airlines hate how expensive it is (hence it is not a viable method of transmitting more volumes of more desired data, like position data, regularly etc.) but have no great alternative that they can develop to replace it?
gnfargbl|11 months ago
Fortunately, nobody on the internet has the urge to break things just for the hell of it, so I'm sure everything will be fine.
PatchworkCasino|11 months ago
Only 4 active connections allowed per site on a popular HAM webring? Never hogged by bots.
Site that allows minimally authenticated posting of aircraft ACARS messages? Never seen it hijacked for ads.
Physics-limited space for nearly untracable HF radio transmissions that can span half the US? Handfull of trolls that voluntarily relegate themselves to the 'troll freqs'.
It's no surprise the site allows unauthenticated JSON; in the rest of the hobby the FCC makes most types of security outright illegal.
sneak|11 months ago
kylemh|11 months ago
marcellus23|11 months ago
0: https://acarsdrama.com/fmc.webp
Unrelated, this one is cute: https://infosec.exchange/@acarsdrama/114194436695883209
Suppafly|11 months ago
QWERTY predates electronic devices.
sdh9|11 months ago
Every aircraft that I've ever flown has an alphabetical keyboard. Typically horizontal space is valuable, yet vertical space is less valuable, so it's easy to make the keyboard long but not wide. However, as others pointed out, it seems to be changing in newer jets.
dhosek|11 months ago
stronglikedan|11 months ago
Only until you're used to it. Then it's just as natural as switching between a keypad with a 1 in the top left versus one with a 7 in the top left. Your brain just takes the wheel.
lxgr|11 months ago
Now that's changed, but changing the keyboard now would ruin older pilots' muscle memory.
sooperserieous|11 months ago
q3k|11 months ago
You get used to it, same as you got used to a QWERTY keyboard.
(note: this based on my experience often interacting with another device with an alphabetic keyboard, not an FMC)
joezydeco|11 months ago
tyingq|11 months ago
Changing anything significant on an aircraft requires certification though. So you typically have to have a very good cause to do it.
the__alchemist|11 months ago
cccbbbaaa|11 months ago
closewith|11 months ago
jparishy|11 months ago
A very common flow for me when I see something weird on adsb or fr24 is to grab the ICAO address of the plane and search it on https://app.airframes.io/ to see if it was sending out any ACARS messages so I can... see what the drama was ha!
It's a really fun hobby if you find this stuff interesting. You can pick up an SDR online for like $30 USD and be able to do all this without Internet, above your own home.
jcims|11 months ago
https://www.flightradar24.com/add-coverage
MR4D|11 months ago
Clearly I need more coffee.
lproven|11 months ago
_-_-__-_-_-|11 months ago
jcims|11 months ago
https://infosec.exchange/@acarsdrama/114160399911092776
thot_experiment|11 months ago
billyhoffman|11 months ago
Message: DISPMORNING. NEED LEO TO MEET THE AC. A PAX WAS INAPPROPRIATELY TOUCHING ANOTHER PAX IN THE ROW INFRONT OF THEM. THE FAS HAVE THE SEAT NUMBER ANDMANIFEST. FYI AND THX
https://infosec.exchange/@acarsdrama/114195325338601167
[edit: Ahh, its a Frontier flight] https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/keyword/N387FR
RicoElectrico|11 months ago
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Korean_Air_Flight_085
refulgentis|11 months ago
- I know what ACARS, is and understood less of what's going on here after reading the "What is ACARS drama?"
- It's an uncomfortable mirror, a reminder that not everything has to become puerile entertainment. I wouldn't call anything I read in the messages "drama"
- The odd obsession over framing it as "drama" & humorous, to the point it is difficult to understand the "what is this?", and collaborators are invited to "Feed the drama"
- Open endpoint for anyone to contribute "drama", meaning, anyone can feed anything they want, into this very official-looking feed, without any sourcing / clarification / anything
I see how this can read quickly as negativity unfairly directed at creative spirit, the motive power behind man.
What tipped me over into "well, it's worth expressing the ick" is that a full 20% of the comments, 14/64, are communicating, speculating, then riffing on, a passenger being molested.
financetechbro|11 months ago
Comments riffing on the LEO request for PAX TOUCHING PAX is just typical forum stuff. Not something that I condone and somewhat unsavory, but it’s the internet and people riff on much more horrible stuff online. Doesn’t mean it’s okay but just not a specific flaw of this project, imo…
gosub100|11 months ago
wylie39|11 months ago
tjohns|11 months ago
18 U.S.C. § 2511(2)(g)(ii)(I/IV):
"It shall not be unlawful under this chapter or chapter 121 of this title for any person to intercept any radio communication which is transmitted by any station for the use of the general public, or that relates to ships, aircraft, vehicles, or persons in distress;... or by any marine or aeronautical communications system."
outworlder|11 months ago
willyt|11 months ago
jcims|11 months ago
modin|11 months ago
Message: LOOKS LIKE WORKING NOW. WE TURNED OFF THEN ON FROM FLT DECK THX
Different industries, same procedures :-D
https://infosec.exchange/@acarsdrama/114189077174169462
zX41ZdbW|11 months ago
supernova87a|11 months ago
buildbot|11 months ago
Well, that would be awkward.
mmastrac|11 months ago
HOWDY, WERE GOING TO NEED LEO MEET THE AIRPLANE FOR A PERSON TOUCHING ANOTHER PAX.
petesergeant|11 months ago
wulfstan|11 months ago
mrguyorama|11 months ago
NO VITALS. NO MEDICAL PROFESSIONALS ON BOARD
https://infosec.exchange/@acarsdrama/114200787168449171
MBCook|11 months ago
By why show the ones with only an ETA and FOB? Is FOB code for something interesting?
isabanin|11 months ago
weard_beard|11 months ago
ape4|11 months ago
sdh9|11 months ago
cmpaul|11 months ago
[deleted]
reportgunner|11 months ago
Check this summary out though I typed it out with my hands:
- airplane people use radio based on some standards from the 1970s to talk to ground people
- said airplanes fly over a guy's house so he can receive airplane people messages
- guy filters out human readable parts and has a bot that picks few of them that could be funny
- bot posts it online
joezydeco|11 months ago
Leynos|11 months ago
[deleted]