top | item 43474313 (no title) malisper | 11 months ago if the three numbers are a, b, and c, then either a+b=c, a+c=b, or b+c=a discuss order hn newest bena|11 months ago And they must all be positive integers.So A + B = C and A + C = B. But we know that A + B = C, so we can replace C with (A + B). So we know that A + A + B = B.So 2A + B = B. Or 2A = 0.And this holds any way you slice it.Even if you were to try and brute force it.A = 1B = 2Then C = 3. But A + C has to equal B. That's 1 + 3 = 2? That's not true.I don't see a case where you can add to the sum of two numbers one of the numbers and get the other number.I'm guessing that's a misreading of the problem. Because it looks like the third number is the sum of the first two. refulgentis|11 months ago One of the cases has to be true, not all 3. (as you show, they're mutually exclusive for positive integers) i.e. "either" is important in the parent comment. load replies (1)
bena|11 months ago And they must all be positive integers.So A + B = C and A + C = B. But we know that A + B = C, so we can replace C with (A + B). So we know that A + A + B = B.So 2A + B = B. Or 2A = 0.And this holds any way you slice it.Even if you were to try and brute force it.A = 1B = 2Then C = 3. But A + C has to equal B. That's 1 + 3 = 2? That's not true.I don't see a case where you can add to the sum of two numbers one of the numbers and get the other number.I'm guessing that's a misreading of the problem. Because it looks like the third number is the sum of the first two. refulgentis|11 months ago One of the cases has to be true, not all 3. (as you show, they're mutually exclusive for positive integers) i.e. "either" is important in the parent comment. load replies (1)
refulgentis|11 months ago One of the cases has to be true, not all 3. (as you show, they're mutually exclusive for positive integers) i.e. "either" is important in the parent comment. load replies (1)
bena|11 months ago
So A + B = C and A + C = B. But we know that A + B = C, so we can replace C with (A + B). So we know that A + A + B = B.
So 2A + B = B. Or 2A = 0.
And this holds any way you slice it.
Even if you were to try and brute force it.
A = 1
B = 2
Then C = 3. But A + C has to equal B. That's 1 + 3 = 2? That's not true.
I don't see a case where you can add to the sum of two numbers one of the numbers and get the other number.
I'm guessing that's a misreading of the problem. Because it looks like the third number is the sum of the first two.
refulgentis|11 months ago