top | item 4347653

Introducing Amazon Game Studios

54 points| benwerd | 13 years ago |games.amazon.com | reply

37 comments

order
[+] j_baker|13 years ago|reply
Why is Amazon making social games, you ask? Good question! We know that many Amazon customers enjoy playing games – including free-to-play social games – and thanks to Amazon's know-how, we believe we can deliver a great, accessible gaming experience that gamers and our customers can play any time.

Translation: We need more ways to extract money from our customers. People throw bags of money at social game makers, so we'll do that too and add in a blurb about our experience so our customers will think we've really thought this through.

[+] bazookaBen|13 years ago|reply
every large internet corporation catering to mobile communities has a team dedicated to researching, or making social games.
[+] sulife|13 years ago|reply
I'm surprised Groupon hasn't made their own social games.
[+] chucknelson|13 years ago|reply
At this point I would think we all expect something ground-breaking or at least exciting from Amazon with any announcement they make. An Amazon game studio with a launch game that consists of "social" picture hunts is definitely not what I expected when I visited the link. Disappointing.
[+] rgbrgb|13 years ago|reply
I think Amazon's general strategy is to never surprise its customers. That's good for retail and low-end tech. Probably it's also good for cheap games. Where I think they'll have trouble is in more cutting edge type stuff but I don't see them entering into something like that any time soon.
[+] smashing|13 years ago|reply
That http://games.amazon.com/ is tied into Facebook apps and not the Amazon Fire[1] really shows the commitment to their own platform.

[1] http://www.amazon.com/Best-Sellers-Appstore-Android-Game-App...

[+] jc4p|13 years ago|reply
Their game studio has been in development for years (I interviewed with them when they were already on their way, close to two years ago), way before the Fire came out. But yeah, it seems like a bad decision not to at least port their games to their own system too.
[+] benwerd|13 years ago|reply
This seems like a misstep to me. Amazon is a conduit for content to be bought and sold - it shouldn't create content itself. Now, a game platform I could totally understand.
[+] duaneb|13 years ago|reply
I never got this attitude. "They are expanding beyond their core base, they shouldn't do that!" Why, exactly, this is the case mystifies me. A) Amazon is a better judge than anyone on what they can or cannot do, let alone should and shouldn't. B) Diversification is simply good business. C) Amazon is not expanding into drastically new markets. If anything, their initial jump into selling software (AWS) was a riskier proposition because it was unlike anything Amazon had done before, and a relatively untried business.

Finally: People scoffed at the iPod and iPhone when they came out; it wasn't Apple's business to go into consumer electronics or even telecoms. The Michelin Tires company produces the most widely respected restaurant guide. Clearly, someone should have put a stop to them - they shouldn't have done that.

Much like Bic is the maker for cheap, plastic tools (pens, razors, lighters), I don't see why Amazon can't continue to write software. There is virtually no risk and minimal investment.

[+] wtracy|13 years ago|reply
Indeed. Even the Kindle and Kindle Fire made sense as platforms for selling other stuff. I don't see that here, and I'm kind of scratching my head.
[+] ghshephard|13 years ago|reply
Apple has already made huge inroads to content production already by starting their book publishing house. For better or worse, this is a logical extension of that strategy.
[+] commandar|13 years ago|reply
You don't think they were already dipping their toes in these waters with their book publishing programs? What about Amazon Studios, which is funding film making?

While a change of direction, I don't think it's an abrupt one. Amazon has been slowly drifting toward creating their own content for a while now.

[+] aasarava|13 years ago|reply
Amazon owns other "content creators" too, like dpreview.com, which it bought in 2007.
[+] uvTwitch|13 years ago|reply
This really seems like it might be some exec's strawman example as why amazon should stay out of the gaming space. They can't be serious, can they?
[+] TazeTSchnitzel|13 years ago|reply
Methinks this is some high-up executive's pet project. How else would Amazon decide to make a social game that doesn't run on Android, a platform they're quite invested in, or HTML5, and a moving-item game, no less?
[+] shinratdr|13 years ago|reply
How odd that it's a Facebook game and not an Android app, considering Amazon's investment in that realm.
[+] wtracy|13 years ago|reply
A different possible motivation for this just occurred to me: Maybe Amazon is getting tired of paying out affiliate fees, and is envisioning this as an in-house advertising channel?
[+] ippisl|13 years ago|reply
I too think this is an advertising play.

Amazon is really building an advertising and tracking ecosystem with it's store, it's tablets(and maybe smartphones) and it's tracked browser, it's video service and it's groupon clone and now this social game.

Online direct advertising is great but: Online advertising haven't had much success in brand advertising. having control of a big advertising ecosystem together with complete knowledge of the consumer in store behavior lets you measure the long term connection between a highly targeted ad and in-store behavior later on. Basically solving online brand advertising.

Having such a huge advantage could be a powerful weapon for amazon against brick and mortar stores.

[+] Robby2012|13 years ago|reply
I sincerely don't understand this move
[+] chii|13 years ago|reply
I know (quite a few) developers who likes to make games (so i assume making games is something that good developers find interesting and fun).

There is money in social games (as far as the PHB can see from zynga). Amazon has an amazing cloud platform that these games can execute from.

I totally understand the move.

[+] thinkingisfun|13 years ago|reply
new rule: it's not a game unless you can loose.

also, "social"? either it's multiplayer or it's not.

[+] kilian|13 years ago|reply
I think a whole host of Lucasarts-style adventure game enthusiasts would disagree with you ;)
[+] thinkingisfun|13 years ago|reply
Disagree? Feel free to put your arguments where your vote button is ;)