[knowknow]

The comment is saying that liberal politicians should be

>prioritizing housing, infrastructure and government services supporting people's economic activity of all kinds.

Nothing about what you mentioned at all. Nor did I ever claim Kamala ran on what you said. The fact that you and the commenter have different ideas of what rational policies are and assume politicians should be running on that platform is part of the bias. You assume that most people want the same thing as you but most people don’t. The majority actually enjoy social issues.

[tsimionescu]

They were was also saying:

> Delivering better lives for people, and having the courage to stand up to vested interests, from house owners to corporations

So I interpreted the first part in a more revolutionary direction, though you may be right that they were thinking a different direction than I was.