[throwaway7679]

> It needs to be screened by someone

The people using this stuff want plausible deniability. If there's a problem with the slop, the computer did it, not me.

Screening it is contrary to that, so they won't do it.

[astrange]

That isn't an AI image. This thread is people winning an argument in their own heads.

It actually very much looks like the kind of ads for chemical companies you see in Japanese airports. (A funny contrast to the UK, which has decided it doesn't need to have an economy anymore so literally every ad in the London subway is for a musical.)

[jacobgkau]

> That isn't an AI image.

What's your source for that assertion? The image has AI-isms and is suspiciously similar to a much less AI-looking image that someone else in the thread linked to in a PDF regarding the research. You can say it looks like a human could've done it, but that's not any less "winning an argument in your own head" unless you've got evidence of what human drew that image.