top | item 43508816 (no title) topsycatt | 11 months ago I'm on the Google side of the equation. I think the title is a bit sensationalized, but that's the author's prerogative. discuss order hn newest devdudect|11 months ago When are we going to be able to run sandboxed php code? simonw|11 months ago You can run PHP in ChatGPT Code Interpreter today if you upload the right binary (also Deno and Lua and more): https://til.simonwillison.net/llms/code-interpreter-expansio... topsycatt|11 months ago We could, it's just not high up on the priority list. Any particular reason you want php? load replies (4) koakuma-chan|11 months ago > but that's the author's prerogativeYou submitted this. topsycatt|11 months ago I submitted this HN link with a title that exactly matches the one on the article, but I didn't write the title on the article. AFAIK HN posts should match the title of the article they link to. load replies (2) marcellus23|11 months ago From the HN guidelines:> Otherwise please use the original title, unless it is misleading or linkbait; don't editorialize.Arguably this is misleading or clickbait, but safer to err on the side of using the original title. wil421|11 months ago Even better, OP shared something OP didn’t write but thought it was interesting.
devdudect|11 months ago When are we going to be able to run sandboxed php code? simonw|11 months ago You can run PHP in ChatGPT Code Interpreter today if you upload the right binary (also Deno and Lua and more): https://til.simonwillison.net/llms/code-interpreter-expansio... topsycatt|11 months ago We could, it's just not high up on the priority list. Any particular reason you want php? load replies (4)
simonw|11 months ago You can run PHP in ChatGPT Code Interpreter today if you upload the right binary (also Deno and Lua and more): https://til.simonwillison.net/llms/code-interpreter-expansio...
topsycatt|11 months ago We could, it's just not high up on the priority list. Any particular reason you want php? load replies (4)
koakuma-chan|11 months ago > but that's the author's prerogativeYou submitted this. topsycatt|11 months ago I submitted this HN link with a title that exactly matches the one on the article, but I didn't write the title on the article. AFAIK HN posts should match the title of the article they link to. load replies (2) marcellus23|11 months ago From the HN guidelines:> Otherwise please use the original title, unless it is misleading or linkbait; don't editorialize.Arguably this is misleading or clickbait, but safer to err on the side of using the original title. wil421|11 months ago Even better, OP shared something OP didn’t write but thought it was interesting.
topsycatt|11 months ago I submitted this HN link with a title that exactly matches the one on the article, but I didn't write the title on the article. AFAIK HN posts should match the title of the article they link to. load replies (2)
marcellus23|11 months ago From the HN guidelines:> Otherwise please use the original title, unless it is misleading or linkbait; don't editorialize.Arguably this is misleading or clickbait, but safer to err on the side of using the original title.
wil421|11 months ago Even better, OP shared something OP didn’t write but thought it was interesting.
devdudect|11 months ago
simonw|11 months ago
topsycatt|11 months ago
koakuma-chan|11 months ago
You submitted this.
topsycatt|11 months ago
marcellus23|11 months ago
> Otherwise please use the original title, unless it is misleading or linkbait; don't editorialize.
Arguably this is misleading or clickbait, but safer to err on the side of using the original title.
wil421|11 months ago