top | item 43512965 (no title) kfuse | 11 months ago Maybe one reason is its verbosity for small everyday tasks, like config files or when representing arrays. If xml allowed empty tags there probably would be no need for json. discuss order hn newest forty|11 months ago Empty tag as in <tag /> ? amy_petrik|11 months ago That's a bit confusing to me, I don't understand. I think that type of tagging can be ambiguous. Just to suggest a better construct:<tag type="tag" class="tag" purpose="tag" tag_subtype="empty" description="this is a emptytag, a subtype of tag" empty="true"></tag>Now, that's not perfect, I would even describe it as minimalist, but I hope it sets you in the right direction!
forty|11 months ago Empty tag as in <tag /> ? amy_petrik|11 months ago That's a bit confusing to me, I don't understand. I think that type of tagging can be ambiguous. Just to suggest a better construct:<tag type="tag" class="tag" purpose="tag" tag_subtype="empty" description="this is a emptytag, a subtype of tag" empty="true"></tag>Now, that's not perfect, I would even describe it as minimalist, but I hope it sets you in the right direction!
amy_petrik|11 months ago That's a bit confusing to me, I don't understand. I think that type of tagging can be ambiguous. Just to suggest a better construct:<tag type="tag" class="tag" purpose="tag" tag_subtype="empty" description="this is a emptytag, a subtype of tag" empty="true"></tag>Now, that's not perfect, I would even describe it as minimalist, but I hope it sets you in the right direction!
forty|11 months ago
amy_petrik|11 months ago
<tag type="tag" class="tag" purpose="tag" tag_subtype="empty" description="this is a emptytag, a subtype of tag" empty="true"></tag>
Now, that's not perfect, I would even describe it as minimalist, but I hope it sets you in the right direction!