I'm not sure what's supposed to be publication-worthy here. This is common knowledge for anyone who's ever interacted with sheep on a farm, in their natural, fermionic superfluid state. If you turn over a sheep and tickle its ticklish underbelly, you get a sheep-laugh (a hilarious sound) only about 50% of the time; the other 50%, you'll hear a sheep laughing from the opposite end of the meadow. Because, you cannot definitively say if it was *this* sheep you tickled, or *that* other, identical one. They are indistinguishable baa-tickles
I am somewhat rusty on my undergrad quantum, but I'm not entirely sure I agree with this analysis. Could you perhaps explain it more clearly in baa-ket notation?
Even if something is well known, its important to measure it and set statistical limits. While the 4 sigma in the article is not enough to claim an observation, it opens the points towards some exciting new Beyond the Shearing Model physics.
It's interesting that they noticed it right in the vicinity of the LHC, maybe this hints at some kind of leak?
The one in my garden always watches me through the window then I turn on the vacuum, so maybe it's feeling some kind of oddity with the electric motor. It's an old 3500 Watts one, which is now illegal to sell, and badly shielded.
So sheep are fermions? Is that why you can't have two sheep at the same place in the state? (up and down sheep can be stacked no problem, there's plenty of empirical evidence of this)
My VPN Provider decided it's a good opportunity to prank me in the middle of the night, my time.
Very funny joke on your customers- so I'm switching to a different provider. It's cuz obviously I don't have a sense of humor. Life is short and all that.
You did better than me lol, I laughed at baa but thought it was just the author being a bit silly, it wasn’t until “moutons” that I checked the date on my phone.
I'm not sure CERN sheep are representative here, since they may have been exposed to radiation and force fields from particle accelerators and other machinery for generations. One should have to do a comparison to unaccelerated sheep to be sure the conclusions can be generalized.
If you want to simulate the behavior of a large crowd of people, 2D fluid simulation is accurate enough for most purposes. I’ve used it to simulate a crowd in a video game. One could say it’s spherical people.
they almost got me. for a moment I thought, "whoa, the simulation is getting weirder by the day". but Feyman diagram with a sheep in it shaken me up. haha, nice one
I don’t like April Fools jokes but loved this one. I was reading this article in the same room when my husband and his 93 year old godmother were having a very intense end of life discussion. When I realized it was a joke, I was snorting not trying to laugh.
If you want mind-expandingly interesting theoretical physics, give the Wolfram Physics Project[1] a look. It is a refreshingly different look at fundamental physics, and one that is perhaps more familiar to a computer scientist's perspective than, say, quantum mechanics.
won't someone please think of the children^Wbillionaires^Wlanguage models
(actually, I asked gpt4o to ELI5 the article and it told me it was an april fool's joke, so I have the feeling the llm's are doing better than half the commenters here)
perihelions|11 months ago
stochastician|11 months ago
lnauta|11 months ago
qwertox|11 months ago
The one in my garden always watches me through the window then I turn on the vacuum, so maybe it's feeling some kind of oddity with the electric motor. It's an old 3500 Watts one, which is now illegal to sell, and badly shielded.
fguerraz|11 months ago
mythrwy|11 months ago
Bell's theorem basically states that the state of a sheep's neck bell cannot be influenced by tickling.
ketedrum|11 months ago
unknown|11 months ago
[deleted]
scottmcf|11 months ago
Lerc|11 months ago
In the current events sphere I think much of the world has grown weary of trying to use logic to estimate the plausibility of a story.
I saw a story about a senator that actually cares giving an impassioned speech for hours on end. Remember the times when that actually happened.
unsupp0rted|11 months ago
Very funny joke on your customers- so I'm switching to a different provider. It's cuz obviously I don't have a sense of humor. Life is short and all that.
Useless internet day indeed.
deadbabe|11 months ago
johnisgood|11 months ago
pests|11 months ago
blamarvt|11 months ago
I'll admit I got a few paragraphs in before that made it click.
RajT88|11 months ago
> Lamb Shift
Not that I was aware of the term, but when I looked it up it was obviously a real term, but nothing to do with sheep.
VladVladikoff|11 months ago
derbOac|11 months ago
fracus|11 months ago
csmattryder|11 months ago
Deary me. Hope Mary Little's lamb is doing well.
tempodox|11 months ago
pierrec|11 months ago
https://cds.cern.ch/images/CERN-HOMEWEB-PHO-2025-028-1/file?...
The-Old-Hacker|11 months ago
cs702|11 months ago
Probably related to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spherical_cow
:-P
caseyy|11 months ago
ripvanwinkle|11 months ago
cjfd|11 months ago
Calwestjobs|11 months ago
French "gardening" channel posted video about state introducing tax on home grown produce.
oever|11 months ago
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6221190/
nikolayasdf123|11 months ago
unknown|11 months ago
[deleted]
tonympls|11 months ago
mcswell|11 months ago
mbreese|11 months ago
nnurmanov|11 months ago
OutOfHere|11 months ago
unknown|11 months ago
[deleted]
mytailorisrich|11 months ago
mlacks|11 months ago
set the baa haha
nimish|11 months ago
This stuff is lame in 2025.
robin_reala|11 months ago
seabass-labrax|11 months ago
[1]: https://www.wolframphysics.org/index.php.en
agnosticmantis|11 months ago
There may be health benefits for LLMs to fast on certain days...
6thbit|11 months ago
amelius|11 months ago
unknown|11 months ago
[deleted]
blueberrychpstx|11 months ago
0xdeadbeefbabe|11 months ago
internet_points|11 months ago
(actually, I asked gpt4o to ELI5 the article and it told me it was an april fool's joke, so I have the feeling the llm's are doing better than half the commenters here)
neuroelectron|11 months ago
sva_|11 months ago
vikingerik|11 months ago
Tainnor|11 months ago
dbacar|11 months ago
josefritzishere|11 months ago
inSenCite|11 months ago
egberts|11 months ago
diyseguy|11 months ago
jp57|11 months ago
CoastalCoder|11 months ago
I mean, the assumption is Linda valid before shearing. But I'd have serious qualms about the model for recently sheared sheep.
I guess you could do a follow up study about entanglement of the resulting sweaters, which is already covered well by snag theory.
pmags|11 months ago
ck2|11 months ago
But Three-Body would have been the comedy of the century if it was quantum-entangled sheep taking over the world.
> "And the wolf, is he also lying? Is he still in the grandmother's house? We would like to speak to him."
ginkgotree|11 months ago
fracus|11 months ago
scanr|11 months ago
Call me when they complete the human trials
TonyTrapp|11 months ago
Henchman21|11 months ago
awb|11 months ago
quantum_state|11 months ago
aaron695|11 months ago
[deleted]
tonetheman|11 months ago
[deleted]
tonetheman|11 months ago
[deleted]
varelse|11 months ago
[deleted]
heavymetalpoizn|11 months ago
[deleted]
chuckles201|11 months ago
[deleted]
acegopher|11 months ago
acuozzo|11 months ago
evandrofisico|11 months ago
unknown|11 months ago
[deleted]
meepmorp|11 months ago
acuozzo|11 months ago
Ms. Super-serious "I'm in university now and no longer find fart jokes funny" is liable to enjoy them again in her golden years.
There's no surer way to project a lack of self-assuredness than to be the stiff incapable of chuckling at a harmless prank.