[lumenwrites]

I'm pretty sure you're wrong for at least 2 of those:

For 3D models, check out blender-mcp:

https://old.reddit.com/r/singularity/comments/1joaowb/claude...

https://old.reddit.com/r/aiwars/comments/1jbsn86/claude_crea...

Also this:

https://old.reddit.com/r/StableDiffusion/comments/1hejglg/tr...

For teaching, I'm using it to learn about tech I'm unfamiliar with every day, it's one of the things it's the most amazing at.

For the things where the tolerance for mistakes is extremely low and the things where human oversight is extremely importamt, you might be right. It won't have to be perfect (just better than an average human) for that to happen, but I'm not sure if it will.

[kubb]

Just think about the delta of what the LLM does and what a human does, or why can’t the LLM replace the human, e.g. in a game studio.

If it can replace a teacher or an artist in 2027, you’re right and I’m wrong.

[esafak]

It's already replacing artists; that's why they're up in arms. People don't need stock photographers or graphic designers as much as they used to.

https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4602944