[ssddanbrown]

Additionally, this submission's title was changed from "Gumroad Did Not Become Open Source Today" to "Gumroad’s license wouldn’t meet the widely regarded definition of open source"

[Tomte]

For whatever reason. It was the original title and is descriptive. Are the mods having a bad day?

[ssddanbrown]

I'm not sure, maybe they don't want to take a hard stance on the issue either way (to indicate how open source is defined on HN). Dang has been receptive to input and updated (what I believed to be) misrepresenting "open source" titles in the past though.

This post also seemed to be thrown off the front page for some reason.

[ZeroTalent]

Maybe they bought SPY calls yesterday