top | item 43624702 (no title) go_prodev | 10 months ago It's much heavier but a lot more powerful and flexible. discuss order hn newest XCSme|10 months ago Thanks! And is it more or less performant on large datasets (100k+ data points). etimberg|10 months ago maintainer of chartjs here.It’s probably more performant. Chart.js isn’t designed for a ton of data and we recommend sampling before visualization . We have a builtin plugin that does a form of min/max sampling to retain peaks but cut down on the amount of data points drawn load replies (3)
XCSme|10 months ago Thanks! And is it more or less performant on large datasets (100k+ data points). etimberg|10 months ago maintainer of chartjs here.It’s probably more performant. Chart.js isn’t designed for a ton of data and we recommend sampling before visualization . We have a builtin plugin that does a form of min/max sampling to retain peaks but cut down on the amount of data points drawn load replies (3)
etimberg|10 months ago maintainer of chartjs here.It’s probably more performant. Chart.js isn’t designed for a ton of data and we recommend sampling before visualization . We have a builtin plugin that does a form of min/max sampling to retain peaks but cut down on the amount of data points drawn load replies (3)
XCSme|10 months ago
etimberg|10 months ago
It’s probably more performant. Chart.js isn’t designed for a ton of data and we recommend sampling before visualization . We have a builtin plugin that does a form of min/max sampling to retain peaks but cut down on the amount of data points drawn