top | item 43653001 (no title) tyho | 10 months ago The single example given here is incorrect. Since Go 1.22 loop variables have per-iteration scope, the "broken" code is deterministic and correct.https://go.dev/blog/loopvar-preview discuss order hn newest teivah|10 months ago Outdated I'd rather say :) I documented here https://100go.co/#not-being-careful-with-goroutines-and-loop... but you're right, it was fixed (alongside 2 other mistakes in the 100). yndoendo|10 months ago I still need to support Windows 7 in my industry. The last supported version is 1.20. Outdated is relative. tyho|10 months ago I wrote some code today and I relied on the new behaviour. I felt a little dirty. josefx|10 months ago That was an issue in 2023? Quite sure C# fixed something similar back in 2012. Is Go still proudly reinventing the wheel, wooden and filled with termites?
teivah|10 months ago Outdated I'd rather say :) I documented here https://100go.co/#not-being-careful-with-goroutines-and-loop... but you're right, it was fixed (alongside 2 other mistakes in the 100). yndoendo|10 months ago I still need to support Windows 7 in my industry. The last supported version is 1.20. Outdated is relative. tyho|10 months ago I wrote some code today and I relied on the new behaviour. I felt a little dirty.
yndoendo|10 months ago I still need to support Windows 7 in my industry. The last supported version is 1.20. Outdated is relative.
josefx|10 months ago That was an issue in 2023? Quite sure C# fixed something similar back in 2012. Is Go still proudly reinventing the wheel, wooden and filled with termites?
teivah|10 months ago
yndoendo|10 months ago
tyho|10 months ago
josefx|10 months ago