(no title)
svg7
|
10 months ago
While I have no doubt that insider trading happens quite regularly, I would not jump to that conclusion here. IIRC the previous day, big Wall street names were advocating for a pause in tariffs . So a lot of people placed bets accordingly. Also staking 2.5M is "small change" for true insiders.
w10-1|10 months ago
But why not earlier in the day? Why this unique volume spike then? The one $2.5M is just a sample trade, part of a historic spike.
No one's jumping to conclusions, but it should trigger an investigation.
lucaspm98|10 months ago
koolba|10 months ago
bigbacaloa|10 months ago
[deleted]
az226|10 months ago
eru|10 months ago
Why? A secretary or janitor or a intern could also be an insider. Or are they No True Scotsmen?
ascorbic|10 months ago
svg7|10 months ago
DeathArrow|10 months ago
I thought the article itself and comments here presume bad faith on behalf of the highest ranking officials.
TheAlchemist|10 months ago
0 day - means it's a win big or loose 2.5M on a single day move.
sorokod|10 months ago
DeathArrow|10 months ago
Well, if it was insider trading, Trump and his billionaire friends wouldn't invest just 2.5 million. That's a meager sum for the very wealthy.
Maybe they've even done insider trading but in ways that weren't so obvious.
unknown|10 months ago
[deleted]