(no title)
Jabbles | 10 months ago
It's unfair to merely critique the headline. If you do not wish to watch the video, here is a transcript: https://www.youtube-transcript.io/videos/elvEcWc7U7c
"This is very important work." is just an opinion.
"The more precise you nail down these uncertainties, the more theorists can do to verify their work, allowing the experimentalists to know where to look for new stuff, if any." Sabine's point is that there are countless theories and parameters that can be changed to fit any measurement. New results will eliminate some, but it will not reduce the total number of possible theories, as others will be constructed to fit the results without having any reason to think one is more true than another.
refulgentis|10 months ago
Concretely:
If you don't think OP got the right understanding from the video, so their questions were fundamentally Wrong and Shouldn't Be Asked and Impugned Sabine by their very nature of being asked, that's fine. Own that.
If you think it's unfair of me to quote Sabine without quoting the entirety of a 30 minute transcript, well, more power to you.
But that doesn't mean I didn't watch it or whatever other crock is being imagined.
Just ask! :) Curiosity and discussion are why we're here. :)
Jabbles|10 months ago
When you say:
"The shell games are:
1. claiming it is a proton collider"
it seems to me that you're implying that Sabine is not disclosing the fact that it's a two stage project. And I'm pointing out that it's one of the first things she says in her video.