(no title)
windsignaling | 10 months ago
I'm no fan of schools forcing STEM students to study boring electives but this is a prime example of why that might be useful.
The entire premise of the post is wrong - average pixel value has nothing to do with how orange the oranges look - it's all about perception.
Here's an example where the same exact color (pixel value) can be perceived as either light or dark depending on the context: http://brainden.com/images/identical-colors-big.jpg
That's what the bag adds - context - but the author hasn't made this connection.
xandrius|10 months ago
To me it showed curiosity and ingenuity, sure they might not have studied a certain subject but it is a totally valid approach to an unknown problem. It might actually get people who have similar "silly questions" to run a similar set of experiment and perhaps stumble upon something novel.
You comment showed less human-ness than OP, ironically.
croes|10 months ago
It’s not reality that changed because of red net but our perception of it.
The solution isn’t in the oranges but our brain
ricardobeat|10 months ago
Maybe a reminder that computer science != programming.
AndrewDucker|10 months ago
But so does its colour.
So observing how a red mesh affects that colour is absolutely worth investigating.
BostonFern|10 months ago
hyperhopper|10 months ago
dang|10 months ago
It's all too easy to come across as supercilious and I'm afraid you crossed the line, no doubt inadvertently.
https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html
amarshall|10 months ago
aaron695|10 months ago
[deleted]