top | item 43683870

1,700 year old egg never broke

100 points| demadog | 10 months ago |atlasobscura.com

35 comments

order

fifilura|10 months ago

I guess they are scientists and know better than me, but my bet is that is will just contain sludge.

Egg shells are more organic than you expect.

This is why you use stuff like waterglass https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sodium_silicate to seal them.

mulmen|10 months ago

> Egg shells are more organic than you expect.

I expect them to be completely organic. What else would they be?

nyanpasu64|10 months ago

The eggshell looks like a century egg, but as mentioned by the comment the contents may have decomposed if the mud wasn't alkaline like the century egg production process.

phinnaeus|10 months ago

It’s a 17 century egg, to be precise

ars|10 months ago

I think they should not pierce it, but instead leave it for future humans to study.

teruakohatu|10 months ago

Science funding requires doing something. Nobody funds you to not do something.

Regardless of getting funding, I don't see why our level of technology is not adequate to study an egg.

yumraj|10 months ago

Depending on how you look at it, the ones studying it are future humans.

creatonez|10 months ago

Don't worry, I'll find another one

mseepgood|10 months ago

Of course they are going to break it.

shrx|10 months ago

I wonder why they don't put it in a CT scanner first before breaking it.

shrx|10 months ago

Apologies, apparently I missed this part in the article since the large ad banner immediately next to it distracted me.

Cyphase|10 months ago

> A Micro CT scan showed that this ancient egg is still full of liquid.

> “Researchers are planning to carefully extract the liquid to better study it,” stated Edward Biddulph, Senior Project Manager, who oversaw the site excavation. “It’s a controlled process similar to egg blowing, where a tiny hole is made in its shell after creating a 3D model.”

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/X-ray_microtomography

fsckboy|10 months ago

>Scientists are eager to use DNA testing to establish the species that laid the egg

how much DNA is in an egg, isn't it just a single cell with a single nucleus? and if unfertilized is haploid?

fbn79|10 months ago

In addition to the single nucleus the egg can contains trace of DNA from the mother

anshumankmr|10 months ago

I dare them to make an omelette wit that.

foreigner|10 months ago

Fry it up with bog butter!

a3w|10 months ago

Can't make science without breaking an egg!

robofanatic|10 months ago

Story of an egg that never hatched.

knighthack|10 months ago

I'm willing to bet there's a dragon in that egg.

kubb|10 months ago

[deleted]

speerer|10 months ago

What's your definition of a scientist?

I wonder if many of history's greatest scientists might fail to meet it.

viciousvoxel|10 months ago

This is actually my wife's job/area of research, except typically they use the eggshell proteins to determine taxonomy. It's extremely rare that DNA survives in these types of samples but the proteins are preserved in the eggshell's mineral matrix.

jessekv|10 months ago

"Scientist" is cool, but personally I would call myself a "forensic archeologist" if I had this gig.

slow123_|10 months ago

duke dennis must’ve saved the egg for breakfast but forgot about it loll