[acmj]

People here have little idea about how Harvard works. Harvard is financially vulnerable. It is currently running on a deficiency considering the endowment. And Harvard can't freely use most endowment for personnels anyway. If the government takes away funding, Harvard will have a financial crisis. I guess the leadership made the decision in hope someone could stop the government before bad things happen but when bad things do happen, you will probably see mass layoffs of researchers in particular in life sciences and biomedical research.

[aoki]

I mean, we literally just saw what happened at JHU when their USAID funding vanished. Everybody on that soft money got laid off.

That’s what makes stands like this hard for admin: you’re risking massive layoffs in the programs that are often the least political to defend the academic freedom of the programs that are often the most political. Columbia made one decision. Harvard is making another. You could make Lord Farquaad jokes here, but if it alone loses its federal funding in these expensive research areas, it will lose its preeminence in those areas for a long time.

[acmj]

I guess Harvard saw the decision at Columbia made the situation worse [1], so they decided to make a different one.

[1] https://www.science.org/content/article/nih-freezes-all-rese...

[saagarjha]

Some universities should make sacrifices for academic freedom, yes. That's what they are there for!

[rtp4me]

With $50B in the endowment, how are they financially vulnerable? Honest question.

[tmpz22]

Much of the endowment is earmarked towards specific ends. It is not a slush fund for discretionary spending.