top | item 43700800

(no title)

rqtwteye | 10 months ago

I think it’s ignorance and arrogance. The US seems to be on a path to lose technological and science leadership. The current leadership doesn’t seem to understand things that aren’t flashy. I wonder when they’ll dial back on food safety. I am sure RFK knows some vitamins that protect against salmonella

discuss

order

johnnyjeans|10 months ago

important to note: the US's food safety is already really bad. salmonella isn't a thing you have to worry about in first world countries. can't wait to see what plague demon spawns out of a food industry running amok after the FDA gets gutted.

ac29|10 months ago

> important to note: the US's food safety is already really bad. salmonella isn't a thing you have to worry about in first world countries.

There were 65,000 cases of salmonellosis in the EU in the most recent data I could find (2022). Thats a lower per capita rate than the US, but definitely not zero.

buzer|10 months ago

Salmonella and it causes are very regional in EU. Places like Finland have basically 0 cases of salmonella caused by domestic poultry products per year. If there salmonella is found from any chicken in the flock, the whole flock will be quarantined and generally fully slaughtered (meat & eggs must be pasteurized after the slaughter if they are sold). In 2023 0.1% of the tested flocks had salmonella.

According to https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11945640/ most of the outbreaks in humans (where exact cause was found) were caused by foreign vegetables.

On other hand countries like Italy find positive samples from 27% of their flocks ( https://efsa.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.2903/j.efsa... ). USA doesn't do testing at that level as far I understand, I only found that 8% of the tested chicken parts have salmonella (https://www.propublica.org/article/salmonella-chicken-usda-f...).

parrellel|10 months ago

According to the radio this morning, they're currently working to close all the FDA branches that do food safety testing, so, good guess?

senectus1|10 months ago

the guy is ultimate small gov. he wants to rip it out by the roots.

dmix|10 months ago

I don't think he's considered a small gov conservative. He increased spending last time and has continued so far this term. His tariffs are one of the biggest expansions in gov interference in modern history. They are also attempting to significantly expand executive power beyond even 9/11 terrorism days.

01HNNWZ0MV43FF|10 months ago

Small enough to fit in a uterus, big enough to kidnap and shoot citizens

Sohcahtoa82|10 months ago

If you truly believe this, you don't know what small government means.