top | item 43709527

(no title)

cglong | 10 months ago

There's a lot of tools now with a similar feature set. IMO, the main value prop an official OpenAI client could provide would be to share ChatGPT's free tier vs. requiring an API key. They probably couldn't open-source it then, but it'd still be more valuable to me than the alternatives.

discuss

order

cube2222|10 months ago

Coding agents use extreme numbers of tokens, you’d be getting rate limited effectively immediately.

A typical small-medium PR with Claude Code for me is ~$10-15 of API credits.

ai-christianson|10 months ago

I've ended up with $5K+ in a month using sonnet 3.7, had to dial it back.

I'm much happier with gemini 2.5 pro right now for high performance at a much more reasonable cost (primarily using with RA.Aid, but I've tried it with Windsurf, cline, and roo.)

ashishb|10 months ago

Exactly. Just like Michelin the tire company created Michelin star restaurants list to make people drive and use more tires

dingnuts|10 months ago

Too expensive for me to use for fun. Cheap enough to put me out of a job. Great. Love it. So excited. Doesn't make me want to go full Into The Wild at all.

cglong|10 months ago

I didn't know this, thank you for the anecdata! Do you think it'd be more reasonable to generalize my suggestion to "This CLI should be included as part of ChatGPT's pricing"?

torginus|10 months ago

Trust me bro, you don't need RAG, just stuff your entire codebase into the prompt (also we charge per input token teehee)

siva7|10 months ago

Why would they? They want to compete with claude code and that's not possible on a free tier.