One of the main advantages Anthropic currently has over Google is the tooling that comes with Claude Code. It may not generate better code, and it has a lower complexity ceiling, but it can automatically find and search files, and figure out how to fix a syntax error fast.
bayarearefugee|10 months ago
Paying real API money for Claude to jump the gun on solutions invalidated the advantage of having a tool as nice as Claude Code, at least for me, I admit everyone's mileage will vary.
neuah|10 months ago
roygbiv2|10 months ago
tough|10 months ago
google models on cli are great.
btbuildem|10 months ago
Sonnigeszeug|10 months ago
Any ide integration?
igor47|10 months ago
aitchnyu|10 months ago
mediaman|10 months ago
mrinterweb|10 months ago
The LLM field is moving so fast that what is the leading frontier model today, may not be the same tomorrow.
Pricing is another important consideration. https://aider.chat/docs/leaderboards/
smallnamespace|10 months ago
vladmdgolam|10 months ago
wcallahan|10 months ago
Perhaps someone can merge the best of Aider and codex/claude code now. Looking forward to it.
energy123|10 months ago
Graphon1|10 months ago
shrisukhani|10 months ago
johnisgood|10 months ago
mogili|10 months ago
ssd532|10 months ago
julianeon|10 months ago
Only Claude (to my knowledge) has a desktop app which can directly, and usually quite intelligently, modify files and create repos on your desktop. It's the only "agentic" option among the major players.
"Claude, make me an app which will accept Stripe payments and sell an ebook about coding in Python; first create the app, then the ebook."
It would take a few passes but Claude could do this; obviously you can't do that with an API alone. That capability alone is worth $30/month in my opinion.
xvinci|10 months ago
But there are third party options availabe that to the very same thing (e.g. https://aider.chat/ ) which allow you to plug in a model (or even a combination thereof e.g. deepseek as architect and claude as code writer) of your choice.
Therefore the advantage of the model provider providing such a thing doesn't matter, no?
int_19h|10 months ago
dingnuts|10 months ago
> It would take a few passes but Claude could do this;
I'm sorry but absolutely nothing I've seen from using Claude indicates that you could give it a vague prompt like that and have it actually produce anything worth reading.
Can it output a book's worth of bullshit with that prompt? Yes. But if you think "write a book about Python" is where we are in the state of the art in language models in terms of the prompt you need to get a coherent product, I want some of whatever you are smoking because that has got to be the good shit
indexerror|10 months ago
thrdbndndn|10 months ago
breakitmakeit|10 months ago
[deleted]
WiSaGaN|10 months ago
mdhb|10 months ago