top | item 43735896

Perplexingly Book-Learned Emacs

71 points| tmseidman | 10 months ago |lars.ingebrigtsen.no

15 comments

order

michaelcampbell|10 months ago

Recognized the domain; Lars' documentation of the Ding! NNTP reader in emacs from... 30(?) years ago was one of the few pieces of doc that had me audibly laughing as I read it.

Scarblac|10 months ago

Is there really not some API out there that knows about all published books? Paid, if necessary?

wredcoll|10 months ago

There is absolutely not such an api. For one thing, nobody actually knows because nothing stops random people from publishing a book at any time.

For another, the major book publishers like amazon want to prevent anyone else from having their data.

Beyond that, book metadata is probably the least standardized thing I have ever seen in my entire life.

Titles, subtitles, editions, editors vs authors, series...

squeegee_scream|10 months ago

I think there are, the author says so, but according to author they don’t make clear if a book is a new edition, translation, etc of a previously published book. So getting a list of published works wherein “A Book Title” is a single result and “A Book Title 2nd edition”, “A Book Title 3rd edition”, etc are not listed in addition to “A Book Title”, doesn’t exist. I would think it’s possible to write a layer of logic that takes a list of published books and removes extra editions, translations, etc to get what the author wants but perhaps the problem is more difficult than I realize

precompute|10 months ago

It'd probably be easier to scrape wikipedia or goodreads.

xhevahir|10 months ago

The author believes that LLMs are toys and sets out to show that you can get some useless results if that's what you're looking for. Tiresome polemical exercise, but it does have the virtue of brevity.

dullcrisp|10 months ago

We may need to start putting trigger warnings on articles that mention LLM skepticism.

signa11|10 months ago

they are not ?