[relativ575]

> But that’s what they sell, that AI could do what the author did with AI.

Can you give an example of what you meant here? The author did use AI. What does "AI coming up with that" mean?

[murkt]

GP commenter complains that it’s not AI that came up with an idea and implemented it, but a human did.

In the few years we will see complaints that it’s not AI that built a power station and a datacenter, so it doesn’t count as well.

[croes]

Some people already said it’s useless to learn to program because AI will do, that‘s the hype of AI not that AI isn’t useful as such like parent comment suggested.

They push AI into everything like it’s the ultimate solution but it is not instead is has serious limitations.

[croes]

It’s about the AI hype.

The AI companies sell it like the AI could do it by itself and developers are obsolete but in reality it‘s a tool that still needs developers to make something useful