[orra]

I don't agree. For a start, this blogpost puts way too much weight on the recitals.

EU law is all in the Articles. AFAICT the recitals can be used in determining purpose, when courts have to interpret ambiguity. But so can other facts!

[simonw]

Sounds to me like you know a heck of a lot more about EU law than I do! Can you explain more?

[orra]

Thanks. My rule of thumb is simply to skip straight to the Articles, when interpreting EU law.

Recitals maybe seem weird because we don't have them in UK legislation. Maybe the nearest thing is Explanatory Notes? If you want to know what a law says, read the law itself. But if the law makes no sense (either as a lay person, or because the law is badly drafted even for legal folks) then the Explanatory Notes may offer some insight.