A more focused way of generating ideas would be to have a multi-step approach, define the scope, collect information, generate ideas, clean up, expand/deduplicate, evaluate and rank, see a figure 4 from a review [1]
Given the title, thought this was going to be another "write it down, get it out of your head" note-taking tool. Boy was I surprised when the first thing I typed in exploded into 10 more things to think about!
Love this!
UX nit: I love that I can 'lock' good ideas in and ask for a fresh batch, but I want a way to say 'I reject this idea and don't want to see it again.'
I kept getting the same 'wrong flavor' ideas even after 2-3 rounds.
Hi, yes this happens very rarely, it's usually triggered when it thinks you are trying to escape out of the subject, try to limit your question length a little. - Thanks for giving it a try.
eamag|10 months ago
I tried to do it based on ICLR conference, and rank via LLM-tournament, see result https://openreview-copilot.eamag.me/projects and process https://eamag.me/2025/Paper-To-Project
[1] https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/A-Review-of-LLM-Assist...
apercu|10 months ago
Except when I have access to the right ears I force some measurable success metrics at the beginning to maintain scope stability after agreements.
ajoshu|10 months ago
jonathaneunice|10 months ago
ajoshu|10 months ago
bhollan|10 months ago
I kept getting the same 'wrong flavor' ideas even after 2-3 rounds.
ajoshu|10 months ago
Thanks for feedback
tianqi|10 months ago
ajoshu|10 months ago
ajoshu|10 months ago
chasing|10 months ago
prmph|10 months ago
And when I enter something I get: "Error: Invalid topic"
ajoshu|10 months ago
apercu|10 months ago
rrdotspace|10 months ago
[deleted]
ajoshu|10 months ago
[deleted]