top | item 43780908 (no title) BigJono | 10 months ago Gee do you think maybe that's why all our software sucks balls these days? discuss order hn newest Philpax|10 months ago No? Of all the reasons software sucks, multidisciplinary programmers are unlikely to be near the top. jajko|10 months ago They certainly are for me, working but horribly designed java projects done by plsql devs were a proper eyeballs bleeding long into the night.Absolutely 0 framework or libs, nothing even for logging. Code architecture that would be left in the dust by most university semester projects.This is how plsql codebases look, but boy Java (and rest of the world) moved quite far since 1995.
Philpax|10 months ago No? Of all the reasons software sucks, multidisciplinary programmers are unlikely to be near the top. jajko|10 months ago They certainly are for me, working but horribly designed java projects done by plsql devs were a proper eyeballs bleeding long into the night.Absolutely 0 framework or libs, nothing even for logging. Code architecture that would be left in the dust by most university semester projects.This is how plsql codebases look, but boy Java (and rest of the world) moved quite far since 1995.
jajko|10 months ago They certainly are for me, working but horribly designed java projects done by plsql devs were a proper eyeballs bleeding long into the night.Absolutely 0 framework or libs, nothing even for logging. Code architecture that would be left in the dust by most university semester projects.This is how plsql codebases look, but boy Java (and rest of the world) moved quite far since 1995.
Philpax|10 months ago
jajko|10 months ago
Absolutely 0 framework or libs, nothing even for logging. Code architecture that would be left in the dust by most university semester projects.
This is how plsql codebases look, but boy Java (and rest of the world) moved quite far since 1995.