[lliamander]

I've heard that accusation so frequently from people who have zero concern about the constitution, let alone even know what it says, that I honestly struggle not to laugh.

I quite obviously reject your framing, and believe that there is a real discussion about how to properly adhere to the constitution in the face of conflicting considerations. But you do you.

[fzeroracer]

There is no discussion to be had when the Trump admin is directly violating people's constitutional rights. If you reject my framing then it's obvious where you fall, you're just not willing to say it loudly yet.

[lliamander]

> There is no discussion to be had when the Trump admin is directly violating people's constitutional rights.

And yet here you are, still talking. So long as we are continuing this conversation, do you have any thoughts on how the executive branch should effectively enforce immigration law, which it has an obligation to do, according to the constitution?