Have you tried using code generated by an LLM? It rarely runs at all until you fix it yourself.
It reminds me of how ezines would publish source codes to run exploits with slight errors so script kiddies couldn’t run them if they didn’t know how to fix them.
It seems that these tests had a rule about not using generative AI from the start. So it would be more like someone entering a fingerpainting contest and using a paint brush.
EDIT: Oh, I misread, that was the USACO competition which had the explicit rule.
I am genuinely curious why people like this are still making this argument long past the point where anyone who is even slightly informed realizes it's garbage.
Deukhoofd|10 months ago
bslanej|10 months ago
It reminds me of how ezines would publish source codes to run exploits with slight errors so script kiddies couldn’t run them if they didn’t know how to fix them.
anonymousab|10 months ago
EDIT: Oh, I misread, that was the USACO competition which had the explicit rule.
Jtsummers|10 months ago
https://cccgrader.com/rules.pdf
It was against the rules.
vunderba|10 months ago
unknown|10 months ago
[deleted]
titaphraz|10 months ago
Legend2440|10 months ago
ToucanLoucan|10 months ago
This is some "the earth is flat" shit in 2025.
timewizard|10 months ago
So, really, they're screwing over more than two groups of people at the same time. I guess that is some kind of progress.
ribcage|10 months ago
[deleted]
jagger27|10 months ago
reneretord|10 months ago
[deleted]