top | item 43813225

(no title)

ilovecurl | 10 months ago

I wonder if there was a connection to the ongoing wrongful death lawsuit after a doctor suffered a fatal allergic reaction at a Disney World restaurant? That's the one where Disney tried to get her widower's lawsuit tossed by pointing to the fine print of a Disney+ trial he had signed up for years earlier.

discuss

order

add-sub-mul-div|10 months ago

They wouldn't be pointing to the fine print of a Disney+ trial if they had a murderer they could point to.

zardo|10 months ago

They would. Someone hacking their computers and causing a death doesn't necessarily absolve them of liability, while a waver of liability could do exactly that.

Enginerrrd|10 months ago

With all due respect that is just not how lawyers operate. They can and will use every argument within their constraints that can lead to a win. That's their job. They are even allowed to put forth arguments that are mutually exclusive and nonsensical when taken together.

shadowgovt|10 months ago

Not directly. His changes were never seen by the public.