If you are interested in a conversation on HN (I assume so, since you made this post), it would help if you elaborated on the ~1 sentence you twice commented in response to a thoughtful writeup:
Which assumption do you see that's incorrect? I don't see one, and I'm sure you prefer clarity to arguing.
Happy to clarify. The parent comment tackles a macro-economic utopia I never proposed.
My post was about individual level gains: using AI to automate routine work, offload mental load, and free time to think, create, or just live.
I’m not claiming to fix the global economy, nor denying real risks like job loss or scarcity.
Labeling me a "summer child" assumes I am naive about those challenges...another projection.
In short, I described a practical benefit available today, not a perfect future.
A thoughtful reply would engage with those points instead of refuting a position I never took.
ImPostingOnHN|10 months ago
Which assumption do you see that's incorrect? I don't see one, and I'm sure you prefer clarity to arguing.
scottfalconer|10 months ago
I’m not claiming to fix the global economy, nor denying real risks like job loss or scarcity. Labeling me a "summer child" assumes I am naive about those challenges...another projection.
In short, I described a practical benefit available today, not a perfect future. A thoughtful reply would engage with those points instead of refuting a position I never took.
trod1234|10 months ago
So you are either not a good and rational person, or you don't intend to survive this. Thank you for clarifying.