top | item 43838860 (no title) AsianOtter | 10 months ago The academic paper tests four obscure, non-production databases on an irrelevant benchmark (TPC-H) to provide far-fetched claims. discuss order hn newest thenaturalist|10 months ago Way to comment on research?> four obscure, non-production databasesI guess you wanna have a word with thousands of DuckDB users?Also Starrocks is not really niche?> irrelevant benchmark (TPC-H)Which is widely used in the industry... probably despite not being perfect.> provide far-fetched claims.And put them out there to be disseminated by others.Keeping and extending what works, discarding the rest.That's how we learn.I wish you more optimism and curiosity.
thenaturalist|10 months ago Way to comment on research?> four obscure, non-production databasesI guess you wanna have a word with thousands of DuckDB users?Also Starrocks is not really niche?> irrelevant benchmark (TPC-H)Which is widely used in the industry... probably despite not being perfect.> provide far-fetched claims.And put them out there to be disseminated by others.Keeping and extending what works, discarding the rest.That's how we learn.I wish you more optimism and curiosity.
thenaturalist|10 months ago
> four obscure, non-production databases
I guess you wanna have a word with thousands of DuckDB users?
Also Starrocks is not really niche?
> irrelevant benchmark (TPC-H)
Which is widely used in the industry... probably despite not being perfect.
> provide far-fetched claims.
And put them out there to be disseminated by others.
Keeping and extending what works, discarding the rest.
That's how we learn.
I wish you more optimism and curiosity.