[ycombobreaker]

If TikTok didn't exist, wouldn't you expect those Pro-Palestine viewpoints to appear somewhere else? The whole thing is unverifiable because we have no test/control, but it seems implausible that the platform was the only avenue for this particular speech.

[umanwizard]

> If TikTok didn't exist, wouldn't you expect those Pro-Palestine viewpoints to appear somewhere else

Not necessarily. It depends why they were primarily successful on TikTok, which we don't know. If it's because American platforms tend not to highly rank content that goes against the US's geopolitical ideology, then no, I wouldn't expect that.

[Aunche]

Social media platforms rank content based on how profitable it is to them. There is no evidence to suggest otherwise. Maybe it would be unprofitable to resist censorship requests on behalf of US government, but the exact same pressure would be applied to TikTok.

[NLPaep]

TikTok isn’t the only non-US social media platform. Why wouldn’t it show up elsewhere?

[like_any_other]

> If TikTok didn't exist, wouldn't you expect those Pro-Palestine viewpoints to appear somewhere else?

Leaked data reveals Israeli govt campaign to remove pro-Palestine posts on Meta - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43655603

Meta: Systemic Censorship of Palestine Content - https://text.hrw.org/news/2023/12/20/meta-systemic-censorshi...

Facebook has severely restricted the ability of Palestinian news outlets to reach an audience during the Israel-Gaza war, according to BBC research - https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c786wlxz4jgo

[_heimdall]

This is the smoking gun of actual free speech violation rather than the US government banning a particular platform wholesale.

To be a first amendment violation this would technically have to involve the US government working to censor American's speech over Palestine. Functionally, though, this is a government censoring specific speech and feels very much like a free speech issue.

[frollogaston]

The companies themselves have free speech. It doesn't really matter how those viewpoints ended up highly-ranked on TikTok, it's their right to choose what they want to display, same with Facebook. And given what happened here, I don't expect Facebook to allow this stuff high-up even if they wanted to before.

Another thing we know is that the White House under Biden was pressuring FB and others to downrank anti-covid-vaccine content until a judge ordered them to stop.

[JumpCrisscross]

> we know is that the White House under Biden was pressuring FB and others to downrank anti-covid-vaccine content

Kind of quaint in 2025.