I view nuclear as a prudent diversification of energy sources:
What happens if some supervolcano erupts, and because of the ashes significantly less sunlight reaches the surface of the earth.
Presumably, there will also be less wind then.
Plats survive some time (days) without light. If there is not enough backup power source (peaker gas plats, not nuclear though) the grid could quickly collapse causing a continent-wide blackout from what it would be really hard and it would take a long time to bring the grid up. Cities would be uninhabitable within a few days (no water, not sewage processing, no heating).
Many birds die as a result of human activity. In the US, the leading cause of these deaths is cats [1]. Cats cause four times more bird deaths than the next anthropogenic cause of death, flying into windows.
Cats cause ~1000x more bird deaths than collisions with wind turbines.
seatac76|9 months ago
raron|9 months ago
looofooo0|9 months ago
biophysboy|9 months ago
delusional|9 months ago
cryptonector|9 months ago
Plot twist: the computer's last act at the end of The Last Question was just an LLM's hallucination.
YokoZar|9 months ago
croes|9 months ago
What if hackers/terrorist attack the power plants?
What if the operating companies values profit over security?
What if an earthquake or Tsunami hits nuclear power plant?
throwaway2037|9 months ago
sschueller|9 months ago
Wind has down sides like moving parts and requiring giant concrete poors. Birds strikes, noise as well as ground vibration are also issues.
bhelkey|9 months ago
Many birds die as a result of human activity. In the US, the leading cause of these deaths is cats [1]. Cats cause four times more bird deaths than the next anthropogenic cause of death, flying into windows.
Cats cause ~1000x more bird deaths than collisions with wind turbines.
[1] https://www.statista.com/chart/15195/wind-turbines-are-not-k...
Ylpertnodi|9 months ago
Unless you're vegetarian, or vegan, how so?
aziaziazi|9 months ago
frollogaston|9 months ago
brrwind|9 months ago