top | item 43928606 (no title) amitport | 9 months ago the ruler was maybe somewhat independent, the nation was not.Romans also considered Herolds to be a just ruler of an "free" Judea as far as they are conceres. That's how often subjugation works. discuss order hn newest rsynnott|9 months ago It was kind of the opposite, AIUI; the Ottomans claimed that Muhammad Ali was just a regional governor, but the country was de facto independent; the Ottomans had no ability to control it. amitport|9 months ago How do you know? It was not free. The people certainly were not free. load replies (1)
rsynnott|9 months ago It was kind of the opposite, AIUI; the Ottomans claimed that Muhammad Ali was just a regional governor, but the country was de facto independent; the Ottomans had no ability to control it. amitport|9 months ago How do you know? It was not free. The people certainly were not free. load replies (1)
amitport|9 months ago How do you know? It was not free. The people certainly were not free. load replies (1)
rsynnott|9 months ago
amitport|9 months ago