I'm not a techie, so perhaps someone can help me understand this: AFAIK, no theoretical computer scientist predicted emergence in AI models. Doesn't that suggest that the field of theoretical computer science (or theoretical AI, if you will) is suspect? It's like Lord Kelvin saying that heavier-than-air flying machines are impossible a decade before the Wright brothers' first flight.
lutusp|9 months ago
Consider the story of Charles Darwin, who knew evolution existed, but who was so afraid of public criticism that he delayed publishing his findings so long that he nearly lost his priority to Wallace.
For contrast, consider the story of Alfred Wegener, who aggressively promoted his idea of (what was later called) plate tectonics, but who was roundly criticized for his radical idea. By the time plate tectonics was tested and proven, Wegener was long gone.
These examples suggest that, in science, it's not the claims you make, it's the claims you prove with evidence.
chasd00|9 months ago
Maybe it’s a variation of the “assume a frictionless spherical horse” problem but it’s very confusing.
waynecochran|9 months ago
xboxnolifes|9 months ago
pixl97|9 months ago
tinix|9 months ago
it doesn't seem that surprising to me.