top | item 43947617 (no title) letwhile | 9 months ago Over 10% of children? That sounds like a flawed testing method or toxic environment, not a disease. discuss order hn newest unknown|9 months ago [deleted] resoluteteeth|9 months ago Can you explain why it being over 10% of children would make it not a disease? garylkz|9 months ago But really, if like more than 50% of children has ADHD, maybe it's not really a "defect" but rather a "trait" of some human.Unless you're implying that half of the humanity that has ADHD are defective humans.Just a thought unknown|9 months ago [deleted] habinero|9 months ago Why? What's wrong with humans having variance?
resoluteteeth|9 months ago Can you explain why it being over 10% of children would make it not a disease? garylkz|9 months ago But really, if like more than 50% of children has ADHD, maybe it's not really a "defect" but rather a "trait" of some human.Unless you're implying that half of the humanity that has ADHD are defective humans.Just a thought unknown|9 months ago [deleted]
garylkz|9 months ago But really, if like more than 50% of children has ADHD, maybe it's not really a "defect" but rather a "trait" of some human.Unless you're implying that half of the humanity that has ADHD are defective humans.Just a thought
unknown|9 months ago
[deleted]
resoluteteeth|9 months ago
garylkz|9 months ago
Unless you're implying that half of the humanity that has ADHD are defective humans.
Just a thought
unknown|9 months ago
[deleted]
habinero|9 months ago