top | item 43961558

(no title)

Aetheridon | 9 months ago

so i wonder what comes after?

discuss

order

Lerc|9 months ago

If there is nothing left, does time pass? Does it pass but is meaningless? Does it no longer exist?

The same question goes for space. Is there any size to the nothingness? To go further when you have notions like inflation, can you have nothing that is increasing in volume? That would suggest a change in state an thus a sense of not yet ended.

It would be a weird thing for nothingness to change state. It seems like fertile soil for sci-fi. Imagine if space itself was kind of Turing complete and once the noise of matter ended it could start the real work, which of course would be simulating the next universe.

coolcase|9 months ago

There is a theory out there that once heat death is done distance is meaningless, therefore zero, therefore big bang again.

mr_toad|9 months ago

> It would be a weird thing for nothingness to change state.

If there are no physical laws, there’s nothing to stop that happening.

willis936|9 months ago

A fun tool to think around such things are Penrose diagrams. Personally I'm a little dubious of strong claims of what will happen in the distant future since we have such incomplete models of physics today. It takes GUTs to predict the future.

https://youtu.be/mht-1c4wc0Q

rswail|9 months ago

That question makes no sense in terms of this discussion. The heat death of the universe means that there is no "after", just as there was no "before" the Big Bang.

The actual concept of time does not exist (at least in my humble year 12 physics understanding and having read Brief History Of Time a long time ago :) )

kergonath|9 months ago

> having read Brief History Of Time a long time ago :)

It pains me to say this, because it is a masterpiece of vulgarisation, putting arcane physics and cosmology within reach of (still decently-educated) normal people, but it is very outdated in a lot of respects. It badly needs something else.

I found some of Carlo Rovelli’s books to be quite compelling, but they are more focused on the topic of time and space-time. Not really the universe in the same way as Hawking’s were.