Fair take—it's definitely context-dependent. In some cases, solo-maintainer projects can be great, especially if they’re stable or purpose-built. But from a trust and maintenance standpoint, it’s worth flagging as a signal: if 90% of commits are from one person who’s now inactive, it could mean slow responses to bugs or no updates for security issues. Doesn’t mean the project is bad—just something to consider alongside other factors.Heuristics are never perfect and it's all iterative but it's all about understanding the underlying assumptions and taking the knowledge you get out of it with your own context. Probably could enhance it slightly by a run through an LLM with a prompt but I prefer to keep things purely statistical for now.
85392_school|9 months ago
kstrauser|9 months ago
You could etch that thing into granite as far as I can tell. The only thing left to do is rewrite it in Rust.
artski|9 months ago
unknown|9 months ago
[deleted]
delfinom|9 months ago
> CTOs, security teams, and VCs automate open-source due diligence in seconds.
The people that probably have less brain cells than the average programmer to understand the nuance in the flagging.
artski|9 months ago
mlhpdx|9 months ago