[octocop]

[flagged]

[insin]

Why we're moving away from all you need considered harmful

[ghc]

It's become the equivalent of the stupid faces on YouTube thumbnails.

[tankenmate]

The title of this paper is a reference to a previous paper titled "Attention Is All You Need"[0][1]. This seminal work described the transformer model that is the basis for almost all LLMs, and is almost certainly the most cited paper on AI even though it was only published in 2017.

[0] https://arxiv.org/abs/1706.03762 [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Attention_Is_All_You_Need

[kristopolous]

Right, it's an 8 year old reference that's been made hundreds of times.

People seem to love going to the references graveyard, digging up tired and dead ones and drag them around town hoping everyone thinks they're clever.

Also this was from 3 months ago.

[netdevphoenix]

Why is this the most cited paper in AI and not the original 1943 paper who started it all?

[amelius]

It's better than "omg, this random thing we tried actually works!"

[jsheard]

Those words are all you need to get to the top of HN though. Think of the karma!

[seeknotfind]

All you need titles stopping is all you need.

[Etheryte]

All you need is love, and for these titles to stop. (But they won't do that.)

[0xdeadbeefbabe]

They won't stop until someone publishes gotos considered all you need.

[EGreg]

We need more than that, and all you need to stop saying that!!