top | item 43975247 (no title) hanlonsrazor | 9 months ago Quite so. I would love to see an open sourced CVE database. It is for the public, it should be by the public. discuss order hn newest c7b|9 months ago What do you mean? A government service is a public service, by any conventional use of the term. Public/private is orthogonal to open source. aerostable_slug|9 months ago Community-maintained might be a better phrasing.There's no particular reason a vulnerability database needs to be government-sponsored, and some compelling reasons why it shouldn't be "owned" by one government or another (one being guaranteed continuity even during seasons of change).
c7b|9 months ago What do you mean? A government service is a public service, by any conventional use of the term. Public/private is orthogonal to open source. aerostable_slug|9 months ago Community-maintained might be a better phrasing.There's no particular reason a vulnerability database needs to be government-sponsored, and some compelling reasons why it shouldn't be "owned" by one government or another (one being guaranteed continuity even during seasons of change).
aerostable_slug|9 months ago Community-maintained might be a better phrasing.There's no particular reason a vulnerability database needs to be government-sponsored, and some compelling reasons why it shouldn't be "owned" by one government or another (one being guaranteed continuity even during seasons of change).
c7b|9 months ago
aerostable_slug|9 months ago
There's no particular reason a vulnerability database needs to be government-sponsored, and some compelling reasons why it shouldn't be "owned" by one government or another (one being guaranteed continuity even during seasons of change).