top | item 43996142

(no title)

davydog187 | 9 months ago

Author here!

Luerl++ is not a valid module name :)

More seriously, I considered alternate names, but settled on this because it was short, literal, and given that its in the context of Elixir, makes sense when using it.

As you stated, the hope is to consolidate it into Luerl at some point

discuss

order

antfarm|9 months ago

Have you considered "Luex", a nod to Luerl but with the typical Elixir suffix?

davydog187|9 months ago

I have a personal mission to never name any libraries with the -ex prefix