(no title)
jamalaramala | 9 months ago
It reminds me a study about the perception of beauty among students of arts.
Before they start their studies, their perception of beauty is similar to everyone's.
But as they go through their course, their perception starts to shift. What they see as "beautiful" doesn't match the perception of others.
They learn what "skeuomorphism" is, and suddenly everything must be flat and undifferentiated.
sorcerer-mar|9 months ago
He calls it a craft becoming “self-conscious,” i.e. the architect’s role is not to create a place to live, but to be an architect, which necessarily entails “competing” against other architects. Nobody wins design competitions by creating the 1000th example of a tried and true form, they do it by pushing the boundaries of other architects’ sensibilities, which are already far afield of a normal person’s. Most results are therefore complete garbage.
vasusen|9 months ago
notpushkin|9 months ago
wisty|9 months ago
Basically "oops we made it too flat, let's make those buttons big and colourful so people can see them again". It's a step forward after two steps back.
Groxx|9 months ago
v3 is flatter than the flat design that v1 was a reaction against because it had such bad affordances.
jpalawaga|9 months ago
yes, it drags people away from the mean, but that doesn't stop large segments of the population from acquiring certain tastes (e.g. coffee).
as a long-time user of tech devices, your tastes too have been dragged in certain ways, even if you couch yourself as an average user.
fwiw. i love android, but I do not really care for their current design direction.
(by the way, you might want to look up skeumorphism. material isn't skeumorphic, almost by intention.
hellonoko|9 months ago
Do you know which particular study this was? I would like to read it.
iammrpayments|9 months ago
http://shopify.com/ https://tailwindcss.com/
Liquix|9 months ago
- Dōgen