top | item 44011583 (no title) generationP | 9 months ago That looks like the kind of paper that causes companies to lose lots of money by hyping up what is likely a less-than-impressive method. But it does not make any theoretical claims, so it cannot contaminate research. discuss order hn newest jrochkind1|9 months ago I wonder why it is so cited in the literature. griffzhowl|9 months ago AI hype, a write-up in WSJ with superlative comments from famous MIT profs. Should do it.Most of the citations are to other papers on preprint servers and I guess a lot of people were working on similar themes and added it as a reference load replies (1)
jrochkind1|9 months ago I wonder why it is so cited in the literature. griffzhowl|9 months ago AI hype, a write-up in WSJ with superlative comments from famous MIT profs. Should do it.Most of the citations are to other papers on preprint servers and I guess a lot of people were working on similar themes and added it as a reference load replies (1)
griffzhowl|9 months ago AI hype, a write-up in WSJ with superlative comments from famous MIT profs. Should do it.Most of the citations are to other papers on preprint servers and I guess a lot of people were working on similar themes and added it as a reference load replies (1)
jrochkind1|9 months ago
griffzhowl|9 months ago
Most of the citations are to other papers on preprint servers and I guess a lot of people were working on similar themes and added it as a reference