(no title)
yathaid | 9 months ago
This highlights one of my personal bugbears. People have a mental barrier when it comes to recurring, low-cost payments; even though the net sum is small in comparison to other things that they wouldn't think twice to pay for.
A $5 latte every workday comes to (260 * 5) $1300 annually. Obsidian sync is $96. Why would you not pay this amount for a tool you use everyday?
poulpy123|9 months ago
It's because they add up. In this specific case, considering OP job and it's heavy use of obsidian, it makes no sense to not pay for the synchro, if only to support the company[1], but if I was paying 8€/month for all software and service I'm using I would be bankrupted immediately.
Ironically this hurt open source and companies proposing generous free tiers the most because the amount of money people have for software will go to the one they cannot get for free.
[1] actually it makes no sense to develop your own tool when alternatives already exists
coolcase|9 months ago
Then now you have Google docs, Dropbox, O365, Notion, Confluence, etc.
billfruit|9 months ago
I don't see it being discussed that widely.
Also another aspect is that many people seems to think Obsidian is open source, while it is not so.
kepano|9 months ago
https://help.obsidian.md/android
Grimblewald|9 months ago
williamsss|9 months ago
Oh interesting where did you find that?
WhyNotHugo|9 months ago
I spend ~€10 on food per day. Paying $5 for a coffee _every day_ sounds like a lavish luxury. Fun fact: global median income is only ~$2500.
> Obsidian sync is $96. Why would you not pay this amount for a tool you use everyday?
If I paid $96 for my notes to sync, I'd still need to set up some synchronisation mechanism for other files (e.g.: photos, documents, music, etc).
I.e.: I would still need something like Syncthing. If I'm going through the effort of setting up Syncthing, including notes notes for it is trivial.
Grimblewald|9 months ago