top | item 44039129

(no title)

hapidjus | 9 months ago

I think you can ”upgrade” the tracks to use three rails so you can handle both track widths. Also there are trains with adjustabe axle widths.

discuss

order

Sharlin|9 months ago

You’d need four rails, a 9 cm separation isn’t enough to fit two side by side. This solution has been ruled out as technically infeasible (I don’t even want to think about what the switches would look like…)

Adjustable-gauge rolling stock has also been ruled out as incompatible with the Finnish climate.

The most (only?) feasible way to do it is to “simply” build entirely new standard-gauge track next to existing track (and then possibly start upgrading the latter too at some point in the future).

vincnetas|9 months ago

This reminded me about a joke.

When engineers asked should we do the rails same width like in europe or wider, the answer they got from tzar was "Нахуй шире"

literal translation "wider by length of dick, but meaning "why the fuck we need wider"

- В Европе ширина колеи 1435 миллиметров. Нам делать так же или шире? - Нахуй шире, - ответил император.

nottorp|9 months ago

Wikipedia says 1435 and 1524 are too close for triple rail, you have to do quadruple.

cluckindan|9 months ago

Not possible here because the widths are too close together to install a third rail.

pjerem|9 months ago

Given the small difference, maybe the easiest option is to "just" update the wheel axles of the entire fleet in the same time and at the same speed as the tracks.

Wheels are anyway wearing parts and are to be changed periodically.

BTW, I'm just speculating out loud.

Stevvo|9 months ago

Part of the motivation is removing the Russian gauge rails such that they can't be used in the case of invasion, so I don't think dual-gauge is really an option here.