top | item 44052599

(no title)

gibibit | 9 months ago

"A single 1-kW jammer can take down GPS for a 300-nm radius.[...] A CRPA can shrink the effective radius of the 1-kW jammer to 3 nm. The jammer’s area of effectiveness is slashed from 280,000 m² to 28 m²."

An example of the kind of unit confusion that could crash a Mars orbiter?

I thought we were talking about nanometers and square meters here for a second. But this only makes sense if "m²" means square miles and "nm" means nautical miles. How about at least using "mi" for miles to reduce confusion?

discuss

order

lbourdages|9 months ago

Well, nautical miles are the standard unit in the context of aviation, so I don't think it's all that bad. "mi" refers to a different unit.

gibibit|9 months ago

True, "nm" initially seemed to be nautical miles, but then this square meters thing appeared. The point is that "m" should be meters, but "mi" would be a more customary abbreviation for miles in the U.S.

out_of_protocol|9 months ago

mile and nautical mile are not the same so it still doesn't make any sense

SAI_Peregrinus|9 months ago

Agreed, though there's a space between the number & the unit which generally indicates non-SI units (SI should never have a space). The switch from nautical to statute miles is still really weird though.

ak1ng|9 months ago

That's nonsense. There is a space between the number and the unit in SI.