I think there was always a similarity or homology between DRM and many privacy scenarios that people care about:
Party A sends information to party B intended for use in a specific context, but wants to limit the risk of it being stored or forwarded for use by other parties or in other contexts.
DRM typically connotes that party A is a media company and the information is a movie or something, but - as in the case the article is about - party A could also just be a regular person and the information could be private personal info.
Yeah, I'm a bit confused at all the Recall outrage. It's an opt-in app that only stores data locally. If you think they're lying and are going to secretly upload the screenshots, well they can do that already.
baby_souffle|9 months ago
15 years ago, DRM was all about the DVD restricting where and when it could be played. Now it seems like we're using DRM to reassert our own rights?
This timeline is cursed.
contextfree|9 months ago
Party A sends information to party B intended for use in a specific context, but wants to limit the risk of it being stored or forwarded for use by other parties or in other contexts.
DRM typically connotes that party A is a media company and the information is a movie or something, but - as in the case the article is about - party A could also just be a regular person and the information could be private personal info.
gruez|9 months ago
mmcnl|9 months ago
orangecat|9 months ago
chii|9 months ago
it's an interesting irony, but it has an apt comparison to GPL - forcing the laws of copyright to enforce freedom.
It's a classic "hack" of the system!
lenkite|9 months ago
AI has made people idiots in more ways than expected.
xp84|9 months ago
kristofferR|9 months ago
Windows Recall would be a pretty good feature if it somehow only worked for real personal computers.
TiredOfLife|9 months ago
enfuse|9 months ago
[deleted]