(no title)
datatrashfire | 9 months ago
Because the deficit was positive between 1997 and 2001, during Bill Clinton’s second term as POTUS.
datatrashfire | 9 months ago
Because the deficit was positive between 1997 and 2001, during Bill Clinton’s second term as POTUS.
jameslk|9 months ago
https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/GFDEBTN
A surplus in the billions for a few years did not meaningfully change a federal debt that’s in the trillions. Further, the surplus that paid down public debt was completely wiped out by social security and Medicare liabilities during that time
Better than nothing you might say, but not the structural change needed to get the US out of the hole
jmye|9 months ago