[fkfyshroglk]

> A product that's designed to strip ads from content for readability doesn't align with their new direction.

Interesting. I saw it as a glorified bookmarking service and saw the readability concerns as what raised red flags for me: mozilla just inherently isn't interested in competing on value rather than on marketing.

[laweijfmvo]

they really went out of their way to include as many "Why" sections and links as possible without saying a single word about why.

[nimbius]

the internet is no longer designed to be readable.

it is designed to be profitable.

[Henchman21]

Its also no longer designed for users, but for the advertisers and bots.

[fkfyshroglk]

Yea, but that matters less than you think in this context as what I want (a bookmark service for bookmarks) matters a lot less than how the service is marketed and funded.

[Multicomp]

They killed off the live bookmarks feature that I still miss in favor of this and it was never the same.

My rss feeds are still around from then. Glad I didn't invest in this fad.

[fkfyshroglk]

There is still no solid way to persist RSS feeds (...especially the content they actually refer to) to private storage. Any serious archiving service today will need to undertake snapshotting a website as it stands without relying on such sickly, secondary signals.

...but where RSS is reliable, yes, it's amazing.