top | item 44070036 (no title) gravitronic | 9 months ago Well, I watched it. The archival footage makes it pretty clear they did it for the lulz and only in the present day interviews do they bolt a social action to it. I prefer if they kept it purely for the lulz because then it was art. discuss order hn newest ghushn3|9 months ago > I prefer if they kept it purely for the lulz because then it was art.Art can exist for the purpose of protest. Art can exist for the purpose of profit. Art can exist "for the lulz".Who made you the arbiter of art?Jeez, you'd look at Guernica today and complain Picasso was an SJW with an attitude like that. ccppurcell|9 months ago All actions have social consequences.
ghushn3|9 months ago > I prefer if they kept it purely for the lulz because then it was art.Art can exist for the purpose of protest. Art can exist for the purpose of profit. Art can exist "for the lulz".Who made you the arbiter of art?Jeez, you'd look at Guernica today and complain Picasso was an SJW with an attitude like that.
ghushn3|9 months ago
Art can exist for the purpose of protest. Art can exist for the purpose of profit. Art can exist "for the lulz".
Who made you the arbiter of art?
Jeez, you'd look at Guernica today and complain Picasso was an SJW with an attitude like that.
ccppurcell|9 months ago