top | item 44071701

Realtek's $10 tiny 10GbE NIC will hit motherboards soon

53 points| Tuldok | 9 months ago |tomshardware.com

45 comments

order

WarOnPrivacy|9 months ago

The word is these new modules will use less power and be less scortchy than existing 10GbE choices.

ref: https://www.cnx-software.com/2025/05/22/realtek-rtl8127-rtl8...

dhalucario|9 months ago

Yeah I was wondering about heat production. What makes them more chilly?

diggan|9 months ago

> and while the company still sells the AQC107 silicon, it is quite expensive for motherboard integration, and add-on cards are, by definitio,n more expensive than integrated solutions.

Not sure what a 10GbE motherboard would cost today, but in 2022 I bought ASUS ProArt X570 (1x 10GbE + 1x 2.5GbE) for ~400 EUR, and just the other day I got the Asus XG-C100C (1x 10GbE) network adapter for another machine for ~80 EUR. Would the price difference between a motherboard today with the only difference being with/without a 10GbE NIC be more than say 100 EUR? I feel like they'd use the 10GbE NIC to raise the prices more when it's integrated into the motherboard, than what you can get when purchasing it as a separate addon. But maybe it's just me being overly cynical.

th3typh00n|9 months ago

Aside from the cost, ACQ107 is not very reliable in my experience. I have one that randomly drops the connection every now and then, even at sub-10Gbps speeds. Switching to a different NIC makes everything rock stable.

jcalvinowens|9 months ago

If you want to add 10G to existing systems, cards with the old Niantic 82599EN chipset are cheap and widely available (now branded Intel). They use the IXGBE driver in Linux, and work out of the box on Windows as well. SFP 10G fiber transceivers are much cheaper than 10G copper: I saved money by using OM3 instead of cat6, but YMMV.

https://www.amazon.com/dp/B01LZRSQM9

https://www.amazon.com/dp/B01DCZCA3O

An old PC I built in 2013 is able to saturate one of those with room to spare.

toast0|9 months ago

I get my 10g stuff off ebay. x520 dual sfp+ cards are about $10, x540-T2 dual 10g-base-T cards are about $20.

For me, using sfp+ means paying for a transceiver or a DAC, vs using my existing stash of rj45 terminated cables. Some of the ebay cards come with fiber transceivers at no extra cost though. So from that perspective, total cost is about the same either way. And I can use the cabling that's already in my walls.

However, switch pricing is still way in favor of sfp+, and my two 'core' switches have only 2x sfp+ and 2x 10g-base-T, so I use the ports I have.

metadat|9 months ago

This is really helpful information, thank you!

$30/card out the door isn't bad, although I wonder what the power draw is like. I've noticed my SFP+ 10gbit cards and transceivers get quite warm (different models from what you linked).

pixelpoet|9 months ago

Is it really saturated if there's room to spare?

PaulKeeble|9 months ago

We could really do with a compact fibre connection on boards for the consumer space that isn't sfp+, be ausd that will not fit on a typical motherboard. We can get away with copper at 10Gb but the move to glass fibre is inevitable and lower power and the enterprise solution isn't a good fit for the domestic market and motherboards.

zamadatix|9 months ago

I'm not really sure will consumers need modules in the fiber solution. Just give them a fixed connector when the time comes.

ReverseCold|9 months ago

I don’t understand this article! PC motherboards with 10GbE ports have existed for years in premium offerings? Is this notably cheaper than the current chip they use?

pcpartpicker shows ~89 such boards, with mid-high level pricing: https://pcpartpicker.com/products/motherboard/#c0=2x10000-2x...

toast0|9 months ago

The article shows an add-in board and says it's $10.

If that's retail price, it's not much more than a 1G add-in nic. That gives it potential for mass adoption.

Realtek also makes some low cost 10g and 2.5g/10g switch chips that are reasonable cost if you shop on aliexpress.

Having another vendor should help drive down retail pricing as well.

ok123456|9 months ago

With such a low price point, it will creep into regular, non-prosumer hardware.

q3k|9 months ago

Oh my god can you please just use normal SFP+ already.

digitalPhonix|9 months ago

SFP+ is not a good choice for a consumer device.

From a physical pov it’s not rated for anywhere near as many mating cycles and requires user care to protect against environmental damage.

From a connectivity pov you’re limited to short runs for DAC or extra cost to add a transceiver on each side.

Rychard|9 months ago

What would be the benefit of using SFP+ on mainstream consumer motherboards? It would further increase the effective price to consumers as they'd have to purchase a separate transceiver, which are bulkier and might overly crowd an already compact I/O shield layout.

wpm|9 months ago

On an ATX motherboard, SFP cages would impede into the space normally taken up by VRMs, their heatsinks, and the CPU socket. For a built in NIC, on consumer boards, an RJ45 port takes up way less space, no more than the USB ports and WiFi card does at the back of the board.

kcb|9 months ago

Few people these days use any wired networking. And an even smaller percentage of those people would migrate to fiber. 10gbe is still easily done over copper.

Toritori12|9 months ago

I tried last year but was a bit scared on how many switchs/NICs/cables are vendor-specific.

WarOnPrivacy|9 months ago

I'm as particular as I need to be with my NIC choices. Mostly it was Intel, especially in firewalls.

But Intel I225 (2.5GbE) chipsets were causing a lot of grief, 2022-2024. Realtek was same as ever and that made them a potentially better choice.

I think the 225/226 are better now. I have a 4 port arriving today and we'll see.

misja111|9 months ago

What kind of cables do you need to connect to your 10Gb switch/router? Do you need glassfiber?

Arubis|9 months ago

You can run 10GbE over twister pair copper.

toast0|9 months ago

I run 10g-base-t over cat5e. I think the standard says cat6, but the nics can't read the markings on the cable :p

devwastaken|9 months ago

what embedded arm platform could use this?